Skip to content
Logo of blog www.exploitingchange.com by Alcera Consulting Inc.
  • About
    • Richard Martin
    • Alcera Consulting Inc.
  • Services
    • Consulting
    • Facilitation
    • Training
    • Speaking
  • Blog
  • About
    • Richard Martin
    • Alcera Consulting Inc.
  • Services
    • Consulting
    • Facilitation
    • Training
    • Speaking
  • Blog
Contact
  1. Home
  2. »
  3. Powerful Ideas
  4. »
  5. Head or Gut? Deliberation vs. Intuition

Head or Gut? Deliberation vs. Intuition

Share this post

  • Richard Martin
  • June 1, 2007
  • 3:27 pm
  • No Comments
Picture of Richard Martin

Richard Martin

Richard Martin empowers leaders to outmaneuver uncertainty and drive change through strategic insight and transformative thinking.
All Posts

We can safely say that humans are decision making animals. However, just because we are constantly making decisions doesn’t mean that these decisions are necessarily rational. In fact, most of our decisions are not rational. They are made on the spur of the moment out of habit or, in more extreme circumstances, intuitively or instinctively. Intuition is essential in crises and emergencies, whereas a more deliberate approach is needed when time and circumstances permit.

What is intuition? Simply put, intuition is when we know something or know what to do without necessarily knowing why. What to do just comes to us in a flash of insight. Some intuitions are instinctive. For instance, if someone starts running after you with an ax, you will most likely have the instinctive (and intuitive) response of either defending yourself or running away. Moreover, your reaction would be highly rational.

Other intuitions are the result of years of training and knowledge building. Police officers, firefighters, military leaders, emergency medical care providers, airline pilots and many others spend years in learning and honing their skills in order to react in an instant with the optimal solution. In fact, society expects these people to make high quality intuitive decisions quickly and with resolve.

A surgeon with many years’ experience in the operating room has much better intuition than a neophyte. The same goes for a highly experienced fire captain. In his bestseller Blink, Malcolm Gladwell describes how a veteran firefighter was able to “sense” a change in situation and order all of his crew out of a house just before it collapsed. This individual was unable to identify the steps in his decision. He just “knew” that it was time to get out.

The same goes for experienced leaders and executives in all walks of life. After years of commanding and leading a variety of soldiers in all kinds of circumstances as a military officer, I could sense when someone was being honest with me or lying. I could also see when a young NCO or officer had potential for rapid promotion. It was the same for many of my colleagues. With that level of human experience, you can just tell if someone “has it” or doesn’t, and no amount of rational deliberation with convince you otherwise.

It is critical to understand, however, that not all intuitive decisions are equal. The problem with intuition is that it can be wrong, sometimes very wrong. For instance, I’m not a surgeon, so my intuition about where and how to cut to start an operation is worthless. On the other hand, a general practitioner, while not trained in the manner, would have at least a reasonable intuition given prior medical and physiological knowledge. By extension, some situations are so novel, that intuition is also next to useless and can even be counterproductive. In that case, deliberate decision making is needed in order to think through the factors impinging on the decision and to ensure that a variety of courses of action are considered.

The key is to know when to follow your intuition and when to adopt a more deliberate and rational approach. In general, the following situations are more amenable to intuitive decision making:

  1. Emergencies requiring an immediate response in order to save lives.
  2. Direct threats to physical safety.
  3. When a group has grown lethargic and overly reactive in the face of danger or risk and requires inspirational leadership to change the situation.

Just about all other situations have enough time built in to them to allow at least some level of deliberate, and deliberative, decision making. It is often wise to involve outside experts and to form an advisory team when faced with novel situations that will require imagination and resolve to turn around. Ironically, intuition can play a role in deliberate decision making because it is often useful for generating insight and innovative solutions.

Richard Martin is President of Alcera Consulting Inc., a management consulting firm that helps excellent executives become world-class leaders and that assists individuals and organizations to thrive in the face of risks, threats and uncertainty. He is known for his intellectual breadth and has led teams in critical and sometimes life-threatening situations as an infantry officer in the Canadian Army. Areas of expertise include crisis leadership, strategy, risk management, disaster preparedness, coaching, mentoring, speaking, and training.

© 2010 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes permitted with proper attribution.


Discover more from Exploiting Change

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ready to

Navigate change and strengthen your strategy?

Let’s get started.

Book a call

Share this post

Richard Martin, President of Alcera Consulting Inc.

Richard Martin

Richard Martin is the President of Alcera Consulting Inc., a strategic advisory firm collaborating with top-level leaders to provide strategic insight, navigate uncertainty, and drive transformative change, ensuring market dominance and excellence in public governance. He is the author of Brilliant Manoeuvres: How to Use Military Wisdom to Win Business Battles and the creator of the blog ExploitingChange.com. Richard is also the developer of Strategic Epistemology, a groundbreaking theory that focuses on winning the battle for minds in a world of conflict by dismantling opposing worldviews and ideologies through strategic narrative and archetypal awareness.

PrevPreviousConfusing Ends and Means
NextDo You Know All Your Risks?Next

Managing Russia Without Breaking It – The Hidden Constraint in U.S. Strategy

Read More »

Action as Evidence: A Discipline for Strategic Analysis

Read More »

Planning Under Constraint: Inferring Strategy in the Iran War Through ISW Reporting

Read More »
Page1 Page2 Page3 Page4 Page5

You've come this far...

Ready to build a strategy

That is truly impactful?

Book a call

Logo of www.exploitingchange.com blog, by Alcera Consulting Inc.

I collaborate with top-level leaders to provide strategic insight, navigate uncertainty, and drive transformative change, ensuring market dominance and excellence in public governance.

Contact me

+1 (514) 453-3993

Latest Articles

  • Managing Russia Without Breaking It – The Hidden Constraint in U.S. Strategy
  • Action as Evidence: A Discipline for Strategic Analysis
  • Planning Under Constraint: Inferring Strategy in the Iran War Through ISW Reporting

Links

  • About
    • Richard Martin
    • Alcera Consulting Inc.
  • Services
    • Consulting
    • Facilitation
    • Training
    • Speaking
  • Blog
  • About
    • Richard Martin
    • Alcera Consulting Inc.
  • Services
    • Consulting
    • Facilitation
    • Training
    • Speaking
  • Blog

Sign up for weekly insights

Sign up for weekly insights

We don’t spam! Read more in our privacy policy

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Privacy Policy – Terms & conditions

Alcera Consulting Inc. © 2024 Copyright - All Rights Reserved

Socials

X-twitter