Why the Collapse of the Global Order Will Be Washington’s Fault—Not Beijing’s
By Richard Martin, Chief Strategist, Alcera Consulting Inc.
The U.S. can still outcompete China. But to do so, it must reclaim the will to align its narrative and symbolic leadership with its military and economic power. That is the core challenge of this era—and the central thesis of this follow-up to my Condemned to Lead articles.
A Tectonic Strategic Misreading
Much has been made of China’s rise and the supposed inevitability of a “multipolar” world. But as someone recently commented on my post, American hegemony comes with its costs—and “Fortress America” may be no better. His question is worth answering plainly: Can the U.S. still win this long game?
Yes. But only if it stops acting like a revisionist power—undermining the very system it created.
A Structural-Demographic View of Global Power
Let’s borrow from Peter Turchin’s Structural-Demographic Theory (SDT). What if we view the global order as a macro-political system, not just a balance-of-power map?
- The U.S. functions as the incumbent elite—still dominant, but internally fragmented, symbolically incoherent, and overextended.
- China plays the role of the counter-elite challenger, attempting to mobilize dissatisfaction among the “global masses” of semi-peripheral and post-colonial states.
- The BRICS+ bloc is not a new system; it’s a protest coalition—fueled more by resentment than by a viable alternative architecture.
But here’s the rub: China lacks narrative gravity.
Nobody Wants to Be China
Despite its material capabilities, China offers no symbolic order that others want to join. It cannot provide a vision that attracts, inspires, or legitimizes. Even at its worst, the Soviet Union exported a universalist ideology that seduced intellectuals and revolutionaries across the globe, including West. China has no such mythos. It offers only:
- A surveillance state,
- Kleptocratic authoritarian clients,
- and debt diplomacy without aspirational uplift.
Yes, there are takers—but there are no believers.
The U.S. Still Owns the Narrative
By contrast, America remains the symbolic center of the global order. People still want to live there, work there, speak like Americans, and consume American culture. That draw persists despite its domestic dysfunction and imperial fatigue. It is a civilizational advantage China cannot match.
But that edge is being squandered. Under Trump especially, the U.S. has behaved not as a steward of the international order, but as a frustrated rebel against it—pulling out of agreements, imposing tariffs, acting unilaterally. This is revisionism by the hegemon itself. It sends one clear message: We no longer believe in the system we created.
And that is what makes the current moment so dangerous.
If the System Collapses, It Will Be America’s Fault
Not because China defeated it.
Not because Russia outmanoeuvred it.
Not because BRICS offered a viable replacement.
But because the United States walked away from the symbolic responsibility of leadership.
The world will not collapse into a Chinese-led order. It will collapse into confusion—a void of narrative, norms, and shared institutions. A true multipolarity of chaos, not order.
Reclaiming Coherence and Leadership
If the U.S. wants to compete—and win—it must:
- Rebuild symbolic legitimacy, not just firepower.
- Cultivate voluntary alliances, not transactional dependencies.
- Reinforce institutional trust, not just dominate headlines.
The tragedy would not be losing global leadership. The tragedy would be choosing to abdicate it—right when the world still wants America to lead.
About the Author
Richard Martin is the founder and president of Alcera Consulting Inc., a strategic advisory firm specializing in exploiting change (www.exploitingchange.com). Richard’s mission is to empower top-level leaders to exercise strategic foresight, navigate uncertainty, drive transformative change, and build individual and organizational resilience, ensuring market dominance and excellence in public governance. He is the author of Brilliant Manoeuvres: How to Use Military Wisdom to Win Business Battles. He is also the developer of Worldview Warfare and Strategic Epistemology, a groundbreaking methodology that focuses on understanding beliefs, values, and strategy in a world of conflict, competition, and cooperation.
© 2025 Richard Martin
Discover more from Exploiting Change
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
